South American countries are stepping up efforts around beneficial ownership (BO) transparency, but the rules still vary widely from one jurisdiction to the next and so does enforcement.

Some governments have introduced registries and AML-aligned disclosure rules. Others are still behind on public access, oversight of foreign ownership and consistent reporting standards. If you’re in a sector like finance, real estate or asset management where ownership structures are often layered or held through trusts, those gaps can turn into real compliance risks.

For legal and compliance teams managing entities across key South American economies, understanding how each country handles BO disclosure is critical. Here’s how the region stacks up:

Country Public Access Trust Covered PSC Register Overseas Entities Register Threshold
Argentina No (registrar only) Yes No No 25%
Chile Partial Yes Yes No 25%
Peru Partial Yes No No 25%
Brazil No (authorities only) Yes In progress In progress 25%

Each country is moving at its own pace, but pressure is building to align with FATF 24 and 25, global recommendations from the Financial Action Task Force focused on increasing transparency around company ownership (FATF 24) and trust structures (FATF 25). Areas like PSC tracking and foreign ownership are likely to see more scrutiny next.

For cross-border entities, even small inconsistencies like leaving out trust beneficiaries or missing foreign shareholders can lead to delays, penalties or reputational risk. And as regulators across the region raise the bar on compliance, a reactive approach won’t be enough.

Compliance Check: Are You Covered in South America?

Even if you’ve covered the basics, it’s worth checking for gaps that could cause delays, penalties or failed filings. Use this quick list to audit your compliance across South America::

🗸 Are we identifying beneficial owners at or below the 25% threshold?

🗸 Do we include trust beneficiaries or other indirect ownership in our reports?

🗸 Are we tracking PSC requirements in Chile and watching for developments in Brazil?

🗸 Do we have a process to monitor and update BO data, not just file it once?

🗸 Are we tracking foreign ownership, even if a register isn’t in place yet?

🗸 Is our BO data consistent across jurisdictions and up to date?

🗸 Can we produce documentation or an audit trail if a regulator asks?

🗸 Have we trained internal teams on what’s required in each country?

🗸 Do we have a centralized way to manage and access UBO information across our South American entities?

Get the Full Picture

BO rules in South America are evolving fast but navigating the details isn’t easy. The laws differ by country, the obligations aren’t always obvious and the information can be scattered. 

Download the full 2025 UBO Guide for a practical breakdown of what’s in place, what’s changing and how to stay ahead. 

Talk to an expert.

Data migration doesn't have to hold you back. Let's talk about what's right for your team.
Request Pricing

"Very easy to use, modern interface, excellent support. Athennian has an amazing conversion team. They helped us migrate all of our data and the training was very good."

Megan W, Director

“When we were reviewing other entity management systems on the market, in some cases, we were not comparing apples to apples. But with Athennian, there was really no comparison. The paralegals were so excited to come on board.”

Linda Escobar, Senior Paralegal

"There are so many things I like about this program, but the one thing that really stands out is the user friendly interface. The program is fast and allows me to enter corporate information very quickly and efficiently. I would also like to note that Athennian provides the most the fantastic customer service."

Kelly R, Corporate Law Clerk

Cloud-based entity & subsidiary management platform
Paper Interactive, Inc. 2024. "Athennian" is a registered trademark of Paper Interactive, Inc. in the United States, Canada and other countries. All rights reserved.